Cases 21 - 30 of 121
Hoeft v. Eide et al
as 0:2017cv02526
Plaintiff:
Richard Hoeft
Defendant:
Nathan Eide, William Nixon, Laura Auron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv01496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv00282
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv00278
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv00271
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Gamble et al v. Minnesota State-Operated Services et al
as 0:2016cv02720
Plaintiff:
David Le Roy Gamble, Jr., Cyrus Patrick Gladden, II, David James Jannetta and others
Defendant:
Minnesota State-Operated Services , Minnesota State Industries , Minnesota Sex Offender Program and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovejoy v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2016cv02468
Plaintiff:
David Josef Lovejoy
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services , Minnesota Sex Offender Program , Edward Kesty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peters v. Minnesota Department of Corrections (Rush City)
as 0:2015cv04083
Plaintiff:
Jameel Antonio Peters
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Corrections (Rush City), Thomas Roy , The Deputy Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sapp v. City of Baudette et al
as 0:2015cv01589
Plaintiff:
Richard Sapp
Defendant:
City of Baudette , City of Big Lake , City of Brooklyn Park and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilbertson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2015cv01563
Plaintiff:
Roger Michael Gilbertson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services , Kevin Moser , Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
