Cases 51 - 60 of 259
Brown v. Does et al
as 1:2020cv03593
Defendant:
Cook County Public Defender, J Smith, City of Chicago and others
Plaintiff:
Ommen Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv03150
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, SIU ENT, John Does and Jane Does Medical Dental and others
Plaintiff:
Wesley Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2020cv03510
Plaintiff:
Melvin Bell
Defendant:
All ABC Bond-Holders, All Known and Unknown Agencies and Corporations, All ABC Insurance Companies and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Turley v. McLaughlin et al
as 4:2020cv04128
Defendant:
John and Jane Does, . Stromberger, . Lippens and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory J Turley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Britton v. O'Brien et al
as 1:2020cv01166
Defendant:
. O'Brien, . Ritz, Andrew Tilden and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Britton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Wexford Health Source, Inc et al
as 1:2020cv01639
Plaintiff:
Dimitrius Thomas
Defendant:
Wexford Health Source, Inc, Randy Pfister, John and Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of Leslie Johnson v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv03054
Plaintiff:
Estate of Leslie Johnson
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Jason P. Crisman, Clinton D. Zoller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blake v. Saffold et al
as 1:2020cv01196
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Blake
Defendant:
LaTanya Williams, John and Jane Doe, Dr. Saffold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2019cv06302
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe #5, John Doe #4, John Baldwin and others
Plaintiff:
Shone Foster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weston v. Dehn et al
as 1:2019cv01288
Defendant:
John Doe V, J Fike, John Doe, IV and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Weston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
