Cases 11 - 20 of 121
Durham v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 0:2020cv01250
Defendant:
Andrew Schumacher, John and Jane Does, John R. Becker and others
Plaintiff:
Hal Durham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roblero-Barrios v. Beebout et al
as 0:2020cv01034
Plaintiff:
Dezeray M. Roblero-Barrios
Defendant:
Lawanna Beebout, Deputy Hutchinson, Magistrate Judge Debra A. Heise and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Herndon v. Avera Marshall et al
as 0:2020cv00441
Defendant:
Virtual Radiologic Professionals, LLC, PLLC, Virtual Radiologic Professionals of Minnesota, P.A., John and Jane Does and others
Plaintiff:
Deborah H. Herndon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Erickson et al v. Pope County, Minnesota et al
as 0:2019cv03061
Plaintiff:
Susan Bristlin, Nate Erickson and Amanda Horn
Defendant:
Andrew Mattson, Timothy Riley, John and Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mehta v. Angell Energy, LLC et al
as 0:2019cv02631
Defendant:
Angell Energy, LLC, Timothy Krieger, ABC Corps 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Neil Mehta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wickstrom et al v. Moose Lake, City of et al
as 0:2018cv02521
Defendant:
Moose Lake, City of, John and Jane Does, Pine County and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Elmer Wickstrom and Bridie Anne Wickstrom
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2724
Pinson v. Lundy et al
as 0:2018cv01663
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
K. Lundy, G. Cooper, T. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wattleton v. Doe
as 0:2018cv00793
Plaintiff:
David Earl Wattleton
Defendant:
John or Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manos et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 0:2018cv00427
Plaintiff:
Theodore Manos and Tatyana Manos
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Mark S. Inch, L. LaRiva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vogel v. Thomas Roy et al
as 0:2017cv03459
Plaintiff:
Donald P. Vogel
Defendant:
Thomas Roy, Patrick Courtney, John and Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
