Cases 21 - 30 of 47
HUGHES v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2015cv01258
Plaintiff:
BRIANNA HUGHES
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY , ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL , ORLANDO HARPER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SPAGHETTI WAREHOUSE RESTAURANTS, INC. v. OLANDER et al
as 2:2015cv00705
Plaintiff:
SPAGHETTI WAREHOUSE RESTAURANTS, INC.
Defendant:
H. WARD OLANDER , SHIRLEY M. OLANDER , KAI OLANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER v. STEELE-SMITH et al
as 2:2015cv00662
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL K. MILLER
Defendant:
CAROL STEELE-SMITH , SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS , VARIOUS JOHN AND JANE DOE MEDICAL STAFF AND PRISON OFFICERS/OFFICIALS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2015cv00645
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, SUPERINTENDENT S.C.I. GREENE, SUPERINTENDENT S.C.I. SMITHFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00636
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MILLER et al v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2015cv00288
Defendant:
THOMPSON, JOHN DOE #5, MR. MICHEAL LEFEBVRE and others
Plaintiff:
MILLER, CHERYL ANN MILLER and ROBERT STEVEN BELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01762
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEPRE v. DOMESTIC RELATIONS OF SUSQUEHANNA COUNTY et al
as 2:2014cv01650
Plaintiff:
GERALD S. LEPRE, JR.
Defendant:
DOMESTIC RELATIONS OF SUSQUEHANNA COUNTY, CHRISTINE LUKUS, ARTHUR R. TILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01519
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
