Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Hyduk v. Medi-cal Benefits Id No.93095289g92307 et al
as 3:2023cv01801
Plaintiff:
Jayne Hyduk
Defendant:
Medi-cal Benefits Id No.93095289g92307, California Department Of Healthcare Services, Washington DC Department Of Healthcare Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi Fed. Question: Personal Injury
GARCIA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv01057
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY GARCIA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(HC) Garcia v. Montgomery
as 1:2023cv00082
Petitioner:
Johnny Garcia
Respondent:
W.L. Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GARCIA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv03603
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY GARCIA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GARCIA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv60503
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY GARCIA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GARCIA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv35562
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY GARCIA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garcia-Lopez v. Garland
as 21-345
Petitioner:
JOHNNY GARCIA-LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Interstate Service Provider, Inc. v. Jordan et al
as 4:2021cv00267
Defendant:
Michael Minniear, Ramone Smith, Billy Wilks and others
Plaintiff:
Interstate Service Provider, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Interstate Service Provider, Inc. v. Jordan et al
as TXE/4:21-CV-00267
Plaintiff:
Interstate Service Provider, Inc.
Defendant:
Jordan, Michael Minniear, Ramone Smith and others
USA v. Garcia-Esparza
as 21-50238
Defendant / Appellant:
Johnny Garcia-Esparza, also known as Gira
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
