Cases 1 - 10 of 175
Oakes v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv01394
Plaintiff:
Tyler John Oakes
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rybicki v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
John Rybicki
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rauch v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
John Rauch, III
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Samoska v. Kijakazi
as 0:2023cv03171
Plaintiff:
Albin John Samoska
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Sorrell v. Kijakazi
as 0:2023cv02694
Plaintiff:
John Wayne Sorrell
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lambert v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 6:2023cv06086
Plaintiff:
John Raymond Lambert
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Berry v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2023cv02066
Plaintiff:
John C. Berry, III
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Castle v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2023cv00413
Plaintiff:
John Castle
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
John Wyatt v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 23-1559
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Wyatt
Defendant / Appellee:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Nehl v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
John Nehl and John Nehl, Jr
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 423 Social Security Act (Disability Insurance Benefit Payments)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
