Cases 61 - 70 of 1,049
Brent Austin v. Dr. R. Steen
as 11-6913
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRENT AUSTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
R. STEEN, Dr., JON OZMINT, J. ALEWINE, Dr. and others
Gerald Sullivan v. Jon Ozmint
as 11-6907
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD SULLIVAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, Commissioner of SCDC, ANTHONY PADULA, Warden of Lee Correctional Institution, RONNIE CRIBB, Captain and others
Defendant:
OFFICER HOLT and MAURICE MCBRIDE, Corporal
James v. Jefferson et al
as 1:2011cv01646
Plaintiff:
Anthony James
Defendant:
Deadra L Jefferson, Jon Ozmint, Lisa A Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clavon Jones v. Captain Thoma
as 11-6772
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLAVON D. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
CAPTAIN THOMAS, LIEUTENANT BRADLEY, WARDEN PADULA and others
Anthony Jones v. Jon Ozmint
as 11-6719
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, SCDC Prison Director, WILLIE L. EAGLETON, Warden, A. GRAVES, Grievance Cord and others
Rochester v. Holder et al
as 6:2011cv00616
Defendant:
Michael L. Abston, J. Aldrick, Tamara L. Baxter and others
Plaintiff:
Julian E. Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Angelo Ham v. Jon Ozmint
as 11-6604
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANGELO B. HAM, a/k/a Angelo Bernard Ham
Defendant - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, ANTHONY J. PADULA, JOHN J. BROOKS and others
Samuel Burt v. Jon Ozmint
as 11-6544
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL BURT
Defendant - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, Director, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WILLIE L. EAGLETON and others
Stacy Howard v. Jon Ozmint
as 11-6459
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STACY W. HOWARD
Defendant - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, of S.C. Department of Corrections also known as John E. Ozmint, WARDEN WILLIE EAGLETON, AARON JOYNER, Major and others
Smalls v. Byars et al
as 9:2011cv00732
Plaintiff:
Leroy Kenneth Smalls
Defendant:
Bill Byars , Jon Ozmint , Robert Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
