Cases 71 - 80 of 1,049
McCray v. Ozmint et al
as 6:2011cv00614
Plaintiff:
Ronnie McCray
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint , Omar Shadeed , Sgt Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Julian Rochester v. David McCall
as 11-6328
Petitioner - Appellant:
JULIAN EDWARD ROCHESTER
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID M. MCCALL, Warden of Perry Correctional Institution, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and JON OZMINT, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections
Christopher Owens v. Warden McCormick Correctional
as 11-6313
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER DEMONT OWENS
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN MCCORMICK CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Defendant:
JON OZMINT
Sheppard v. Forrest et al
as 4:2011cv00486
Plaintiff:
Dexter Antonio Sheppard
Defendant:
Robert Forrest , Tim Riley , Jon Ozmint and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheppard v. Forrest et al
as 5:2011cv00486
Plaintiff:
Dexter Antonio Sheppard
Defendant:
Robert Forrest , Tim Riley , Jon Ozmint and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheppard v. Forrest et al
as 1:2011cv00486
Plaintiff:
Dexter Antonio Sheppard
Defendant:
Robert Forrest, Charley Turner, Tim Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael McKeown v. County of Greenville
as 11-6261
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY MCKEOWN, a/k/a Michael Anthony McKeown
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF GREENVILLE, and its Insurers, JOHN CANNON FEW, C. DENTON MATTHEWS and others
Defendant:
SKIP GOLDSMITH
Rochester v. McCall et al
as 8:2011cv00398
Petitioner:
Julian E Rochester
Respondent:
David Michael McCall, Jr, State Of South Carolina and Jon Ozmint
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Burt v. Ozmint et al
as 3:2011cv00247
Plaintiff:
Samuel Burt
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint , South Carolina Department of Corrections , W Eagleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. Ozmint
as 2:2011cv00063
Petitioner:
James D Robertson
Respondent:
Jon Ozmint
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
