Cases
Jonathan Cary v. The Attorney General of the State of California We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv03272
Respondent: The Attorney General of the State of California
Petitioner: Jonathan Cary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Corsini v. Brodsky
as 17-1461
Plaintiff - Appellant: Gerard Andrew Corsini
Defendant - Appellee: Thomas Brodsky, The Brodsky Organization, LLC, 433 West Associates, LLC and others
Defendant: John Does 1-25 and Jane Does 1-25
Powell v. Pauley et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2015cv04013
Plaintiff: Airlyn Powell
Defendant: Nicholas Pauley , Jonathan Cary , Ryan Derudder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Corsini v. Bloomberg
as 14-2207
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant: Gerard Corsini
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee: Belkin Burden Wenig & Goldman, LLP and Aaron Shmulewitz
Defendant: John Does 1-20, Jane Does 1-20, John Does, 1-25 and others
Defendant - Appellee: Michael R. Bloomberg, Raymond W. Kelly, Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. and others
Corsini v. Brodsky et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv02587
Plaintiff: Gerard Corsini
Defendant: Daniel Brodsky, Thomas Brodsky, The Brodsky Organization, LLC and others
Cross_claimant: The Brodsky Organization, LLC
Cross_defendant: The Brodsky Organization, LLC , 433 West Associates, LLC, John Battista and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Corsini v. Bloomberg et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv08058
Defendant: Elizabeth Morgan, Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, Police Commissioner Raymond W. Kelly and others
Plaintiff: Gerard Corsini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nickles v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00011
Petitioner: Jonathan Cary Nickles
Respondent: Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?