Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Bedeian v. Intermolecular, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv03359
Plaintiff:
Richard T Bedeian
Defendant:
Intermolecular, Inc., Marvin D. Burkett, Chris Kramer and others
Franchi v. Intermolecular, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01054
Defendant:
Jonathan Schultz, Marvin D. Burkett, Chris Kramer and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Franchi
Schultz v. Tartini at Rock Springs Ridge, LLC et al
as 6:2017cv00815
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Schultz
Defendant:
Tartini at Rock Springs Ridge, LLC and Thomas R. Muller
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv00342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rubenstein v. Schultz et al
as 1:2015cv03277
Plaintiff:
Aaron Rubenstein
Defendant:
Jonathan Schultz and Global Fashion Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Wells Fargo Bank NA v. Ashley Business Park LLC, et al
as 13-1407
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WELLS FARGO BANK NA, successor by merger to Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A., as Trustee for Morgan Stanley Capital I Trust ,Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2003-IQ4
Defendant - Appellee:
ASHLEY BUSINESS PARK LLC, BARRY GOTTEHRER and ASHLEY POLYMERS INC
Not Party - Appellant:
JONATHAN SCHULTZ, Receiver for real property known as 570 South Avenue East Cranford, NJ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00185
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv07069
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation et al v. Schultz
as 5:2007cv00592
Plaintiff:
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. and others
Defendant:
Jonathan Schultz
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
