Cases 1 - 10 of 1,361
Jones v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
Raymond Jones
Defendant:
United States of America
Jones v. Strickland et al
as 3:2024cv00468
Petitioner:
Thaddeaus Jones
Respondent:
David Strickland and Baniecia Craig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
Dennis Eugene Jones
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Jones v. Ishee
as 1:2024cv00138
Petitioner:
Rodney Moucell Jones
Respondent:
Todd E. Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones et al v. Eastern Radiologists, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Genevieve Jones, Elaine Quittkat, Jamie Perkins and others
Defendant:
Eastern Radiologists, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
McElwee v. Aldersgate Life Plan Services, Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lloyd McElwee and Kenneth L. McElwee
Defendant:
Aldersgate Life Plan Services, Inc, Aldresgate United Methodist Retirement Community, Inc., William Springs and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Wrenn v. Williamson et al
as 3:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Simone Wrenn
Defendant:
Kiara Williamson, DaJour Jones, Deborah Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jones v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Sharon Lynn Jones
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Bey v. Carter-Haston et al
as 3:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Hanif Rahim Bey
Defendant:
Carter-Haston, Brownlee Whitlow & Praet, L. Marc Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brooks v. Howard et al
as 5:2024ct03063
Plaintiff:
Darius Tremayne Brooks
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Howard, Sgt. Johnson, Sgt. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
