Cases 1 - 10 of 1,024
Jones v. Warden, FCI Becley (sic)
as 5:2024cv00505
Petitioner:
Charles W. Jones
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Becley (sic)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jones v. Warden, FCI Becley (sic)
as 3:2024cv00091
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Becley (sic)
Petitioner:
Charles W. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. Bayless
as 3:2024cv00121
Petitioner:
Alphonso Jones
Respondent:
Melissa Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Barker v. Huber et al
as 2:2024cv00485
Defendant:
Officer J. A. Jones and Brian Huber
Plaintiff:
Michael Jay Barker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Crystal Marie Allen
Defendant:
Krista L. Fleegle, Ritchie County Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, Timothy L. Sweeney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walsh et al v. The City of Clarksburg
as 1:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Brian Hall, Jon Handschumacher, Michael Blake and others
Defendant:
The City of Clarksburg and City of Clarksburg
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00432
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jones v. Tibbs et al
as 5:2024cv00159
Defendant:
Lt. Timothy Tibbs and John/Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Joseph Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00364
Petitioner:
Alton Jones
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jones v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00310
Petitioner:
LaDonna Jones
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
