Cases 31 - 40 of 152
Optum, Inc., et al v. Smith
as 19-1149
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID WILLIAM SMITH
Plaintiff / Appellee:
OPTUM, INC. and OPTUM SERVICES, INC.
Interested Party:
BOSTON GLOBE MEDIA PARTNERS, LLC and DOW JONES & COMPANY, INC.
OLD TOWN UTILITY & TECHNOLOGY PARK LLC et al v. CONSOLIDATED EDISON SOLUTIONS INC et al
as 2:2019cv00029
Defendant:
PAUL MAPELLI, DAVID STEVENS, JACK BOSCH and others
Plaintiff:
RELENTLESS CAPITAL COMPANY LLC, OLD TOWN UTILITY & TECHNOLOGY PARK LLC and SAMUEL EAKIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
US v. Jones
as 19-1025
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
KHARY JAMES JONES, a/k/a Ricoskyy
Wang v. Foundation Medicine, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv11435
Defendant:
Sandra Horning, Daniel O'Day, Troy Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
v. Altitude Costa LLC et al
as 3:2018cv01420
Respondent:
Altitude Costa LLC, Altitude West, LLC, Allan S Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185
Wolf et al v. Altitude Costa LLC et al
as 3:2018cv01422
Respondent:
Altitude Costa LLC , Altitude West, LLC , Allan S Jones and others
Petitioner:
James S Wolf and Mary-Ann Wolf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185
Federal Trade Commission v. Pointbreak Media, LLC et al
as 1:2018mc00021
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Pointbreak Media, LLC, DCP Marketing, LLC, Modern Spotlight LLC and others
Receiver:
Jonathan Perlman
United States of America v. Jones
as 1:2017cv12062
Defendant:
Gregory Jones
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Certification of Dangerousness Due to Mental Disease or Defect
Massachusetts River Alliance, et al. v E. Scott Pruitt, et al.
as 1:2017cv11825
Plaintiff:
Mystic River Watershed Assoc. , Connecticut River Watershed Council , North and South Rivers Watershed Assoc, Inc. and others
Defendant:
E. Scott Pruitt and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
