Cases 71 - 80 of 13,074
Jones v. Camelia
as 1:2024cv01139
Plaintiff:
Nakita Jones
Defendant:
Jennifer Camelia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Jones v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01122
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Jones and Assistant Chief Diane Jones
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Colston v. Babb
as 3:2024cv00054
Petitioner:
Bobby Jones Colston
Respondent:
Sheriff Babb and Warden Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Colston v. Babb
as 4:2024cv00073
Petitioner:
Bobby Jones Colston
Respondent:
Sheriff Babb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rice v. Jones
as 4:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Rice
Defendant:
Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2024cv00121
Petitioner:
Brian Jones
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. Kaushal et al
as 8:2024cv00641
Plaintiff:
Terence J. Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Alash Kaushal and PTL Express, Inc
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Thomas Jr. v. Morales et al
as 8:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
Derrel L. Thomas Jr.
Defendant:
Officer Morales and Corporal Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones et al v. City of Mobile, Alabama et al
as 1:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Monica Jones, Jason Jones, Torin Robinson and others
Defendant:
The City of Mobile, Alabama and The Mobile Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
