Cases 71 - 80 of 1,360
Jones v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01066
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rees Jones
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Bass Pro Intellectual Property, L.L.C. v. Ascend Apparel LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00324
Plaintiff:
Bass Pro Intellectual Property, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Ascend Apparel LLC, Kimani Bethune-Jones and Salim Collins
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jones et al v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01015
Plaintiff:
Robert Jones and Norma Jean Jones
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Jones v. Dever et al
as 5:2023ct03153
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Levon Jones
Defendant:
James C. Dever, III, G. Alan DuBois, April Bun and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Altitude Academy of Barbering LLC et al v. Pitt Community College et al
as 4:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
Altitude Academy of Barbering LLC, Rodney Bullock and Angela Bullock
Defendant:
Pitt Community College, Lawrence Rouse, Rick Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
JONES v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00388
Plaintiff:
KAREN JONES
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jones v. Kijakazi
as 7:2023cv00968
Plaintiff:
Connie P. Jones
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jones v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00958
Plaintiff:
Glen Jones
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
