Cases 81 - 90 of 683
Jones et al v. DISH Network Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
LaQuita Jones, Lateesha Proctor, Patrick Smith and others
Defendant:
DISH Network Corporation, The Board of Directors of DISH Network Corporation and Retirement Plan Committee of DISH Network Corporation
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Jones v. US Marshal et al
as 1:2021cv03371
Petitioner:
Georgiana Jones
Respondent:
US Marshal, Denver City Jail, US District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Rabenberg v. D. Jones
as 1:2021cv03311
Petitioner:
Curtis Ronald Rabenberg
Respondent:
D. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones v. Carter
as 1:2021cv02903
Petitioner:
Jasper Lee Jones
Respondent:
C. Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fly et al v. Carter et al
as 1:2021cv02815
Plaintiff:
Toni Fly and Joshua Stevens
Defendant:
C. Carter, Jones, Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. True et al
as 1:2021cv02765
Petitioner:
Prince Jones
Respondent:
B. True, United States Attorney General, Attorney General for the District of Columbia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Malouf v. Jones
as 1:2021cv02739
Plaintiff:
Michael Malouf
Defendant:
Christian Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marquis et al v. Mitton et al
as 1:2021cv02534
Plaintiff:
Burdette Marquis, Estate of Robert D. Marquis, The and Marquis Living Trust, The
Defendant:
Matthew L. Mitton, Jones, Waldo, Holbrook & McDonough, P.C. and Jones, Waldo, Holbrook & McDonough, PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Kessler v. Schroetlin et al
as 1:2021cv02465
Plaintiff:
Daniel Stephen Kessler
Defendant:
Brett (I) Schroetlin, Charles Jones and Grand County Sheriff Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
