Cases 1 - 10 of 359
Mills v. Bank OZK
as 6:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Jonnie Joseph Mills
Defendant:
Bank OZK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Fernandez (PS) v. ICE/DHS et al
as 1:2024cv00971
Petitioner:
Javier Balbuena Fernandez
Respondent:
ICE/DHS, Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Esquivel Garcia (PS) v. ICE/DHS et al
as 1:2024cv00910
Petitioner:
Walberto Esquivel Garcia
Respondent:
ICE/DHS, Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Homyk v. ChemoCentryx, Inc., et al.
as 24-1720
Respondent:
JONNIE HOMYK
Petitioner:
CHEMOCENTRYX, INC. and THOMAS J. SCHALL
Addison v. Weltcher et al
as 4:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Roney Jauwan Addison
Defendant:
Sheff Jonny Weltcher, Chatham County Jail and Officer Lennerd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe et al v. Rees
as 3:2024cv00274
Defendant:
Jonathan Rees, Greg Ellis, Johnathan Rees and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, John Doe, II, John Doe, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Dillard v. Akinode et al
as 7:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Daniel D Dillard
Defendant:
Sergeants Oluyemi Akinode, Daniel B. Manyango, Obadina S. Omoaka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillard v. Akinode et al
as 6:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Daniel D Dillard
Defendant:
Sergeants Oluyemi Akinode, Daniel B. Manyango, Obadina S. Omoaka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowman et al v. Teams Only, Inc.
as 0:2024cv60044
Plaintiff:
JOHN BOWMAN and JONNI BOWMAN
Defendant:
TEAMS ONLY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jonny Reyes-Martinez v. Jason Woosley
as 24-5006
Plaintiff:
JONNY ALEXANDER REYES MARTINEZ and JONNY ALEXANDER REYES-MARTINEZ
Defendant:
JASON WOOSLEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
