Cases 91 - 100 of 109
US v. Quiles-Torre
as 12-1247
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
JORGE QUILES-TORRES, a/k/a Cuajo
Valdavinos-Torres v. USA
as 3:2012cv00043
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jorge Valdavinos-Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Jorge Valdavinos-Torre
as 11-50529
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JORGE VALDAVINOS-TORRES
Puerto Rican American Ins., et al v. Rivera-Vazquez, et al
as 11-2324
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PR AMERICAN INSURANC PUERTO RICAN AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, UNIVERSAL INSURANCE and others
Defendant:
CARLOS H. BURGOS-DIAZ, NYDIA ACOSTA-ARROYA, RAFAEL OCASIO-RAMOS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
RAFAEL RIVERA VAZQUEZ, ISABEL C. HURTADO and CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP RIVERA-HURTADO
Plaintiff:
LUIS MARTINEZ-BORRAS and IVIS HUERTAS
Interested Party:
ORIENTAL BANK & TRUST, R&G PREMIER BANK OF PUERTO RICO and UNITED STATES
Jorge Torres v. USA
as 11-14136
Petitioner - Appellant:
JORGE L. TORRES
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
TORRES v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv40536
Plaintiff:
JORGE L. TORRES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Torres v. Barnes
as 4:2011cv01804
Petitioner:
Jorge Santos Torres
Respondent:
Ron Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Torres v. Strafford County Department of Corrections, Superintendent et al
as 1:2011fp00176
Defendant:
4 Unknown Correctional Officers, FNU Pelkie, Strafford County Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge A. Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres v. United States of America
as 1:2011cv20510
Plaintiff:
Jorge L. Torres
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Jorge Vasquez-Torre
as 10-5792
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JORGE VASQUEZ-TORRES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
