Cases 1 - 10 of 165
Chavez Mireles v. Garland
as 24-3074
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS CHAVEZ MIRELES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Flores v. Mission Ceviche, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03626
Plaintiff:
Daniela Flores
Defendant:
Mission Ceviche, LLC doing business as Mission Ceviche, Mission Ceviche UES Inc doing business as Mission Ceviche, Mission Ceviche Canal LLC doing business as Mission Ceviche and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
United States v. Chavez
as 24-4005
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOSE ANTONIO CHAVEZ
Chavez-Villatoro v. Garland
as 23-60559
Petitioner:
Jose Israel Chavez-Villatoro
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01631
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
CHAVEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv03895
Plaintiff:
JOSE MANUEL CHAVEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CHAVEZ JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv02619
Plaintiff:
JOSE T CHAVEZ JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chavez v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq02923
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Jose S. Chavez
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ermert v. Modernly Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01037
Plaintiff:
Falco Ermert
Defendant:
Modernly Inc., Jose Antonio Chavez and Margarita Arambula Cano
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05565
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
