Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Wesco Insurance Company v. Pro Interiors, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
Wesco Insurance Company
Defendant:
Pro Interiors, LLC, Wohlsen Construction Company, M. Brett Painting Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Chavez-Meza v. Garland
as 24-203
Petitioner:
JUAN JOSE CHAVEZ-MEZA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gudiel et al v. Atlas & Sons Paving, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Wilson G. Gudiel, Lidany Raymundo Gudiel, Obed Lopez and others
Defendant:
Atlas & Sons Paving, Inc., Ronald J. Cianciulli, Jordan Cianciulli and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
USA v. Mercado-Bravo
as 21-50892
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Ramon Mercado-Bravo, also known as Jose Ramon Bravo-Mercado, also known as Raul Sifuentes, also known as Jose Meza Meza
Jose Natividad Meza et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2021cv05214
Plaintiff:
Jose Natividad Meza and Leonardo Reyes Juarez
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
USA v. Meza
as 21-40031
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Alberto Meza, also known as Beefy
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
MEZA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv49525
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE ANTONIO MEZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jose Meza Benitez v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 19-60819
Petitioner:
JOSE RAMIRO MEZA BENITEZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Meza v. Huck
as 1:2017cv00133
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Meza
Defendant:
Elizabeth Huck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
