Cases 1 - 10 of 17
HOLMES v. VEITH et al
as 2:2022cv01375
Plaintiff:
HENRY JAMES HOLMES
Defendant:
MICHAEL VEITH, WARDEN ORLANDO HARPER, JOSE MANUEL CARVALLO, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Parada v. United States et al
as 3:2022cv00806
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Romero Parada
Defendant:
United States, J. Meyers, National Gang Unit Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
HOLMES v. VEITH et al
as 2:2022cv00580
Plaintiff:
HENRY JAMES HOLMES
Defendant:
MICHAEL VEITH, JOSE MANUEL CARVALLO, JR., ORLANDO HARPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
POLLOCK v. ALLIED FACILITIES SOLUTIONS, INC. et al
as 5:2021cv00365
Plaintiff:
JOSE MANUEL POLLOCK
Defendant:
ALLIED FACILITIES SOLUTIONS, INC., STEVE REARICK and KEITH PENOZA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SOSA v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv05721
Plaintiff:
JOSE MANUEL ALBERTO SOSA
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
FIGUEROA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv05353
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
JOSE MANUEL FIGUEROA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HOLMES v. VEITH et al
as 2:2019cv01398
Defendant:
KARA MARIE SIDONE, ORLANDO HARPER, MICHAEL P. VEITH and others
Plaintiff:
HENRY JAMES HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HOLMES v. VEITH et al
as 2:2019cv04794
Defendant:
KARA MARIE SIDONE, WARDEN: ORLANDO HARPER, MICHAEL P. VEITH and others
Plaintiff:
HENRY JAMES HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roman v. Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas
as 1:2016cv02101
Petitioner:
Jose Manuel Roman, Jr.
Respondent:
Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARANGO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv01533
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
JOSE MANUEL ARANGO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
