Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Digital Media Solutions, LLC v. South University of Ohio, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00145
Defendant:
South University of Ohio, LLC, DCEH Education Holdings, LLC, DC South University of Ohio LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Digital Media Solutions, LLC
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Buncher Company, Stephanie Porreca, Historic Berriman-Morgan, LLC and others
Intervenor:
Benefit Administrative Systems, LLC, Thomas J Perrelli, U.S. Bank, National Association and others
Interested Party:
HEFCO Meadowbrook LLC, Store SPE 1200 Lincoln, LLC, 3601 Sunflower LLC and others
Receiver:
Mark E. Dottore
Petitioner:
Douglas Emmett 2010, llc
Amicus Curiae:
United States
Respondent:
Mark A. Kompa and FSP Pacific Center LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Lopez v. Golden Harvest Culinary Vestavia Hills LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02112
Plaintiff:
Jose Michel Lopez
Defendant:
Golden Harvest Culinary Vestavia Hills LLC, Golden Harvest Culinary Homewood LLC and Golden Harvest Culinary Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jose Michel-Morera v. USA
as 15-2778
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE MICHEL-MORERA
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Reyes et al v. The Imperial Sales, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv03980
Plaintiff:
Jose Olan Amador, Jose Argueta, Valerio Baquedano and others
Defendant:
Danny Dindra, Tony Dindra, Herb Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
MICHEL-MORERA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2015cv02071
Petitioner:
JOSE MICHEL-MORERA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Jose Salas-Olvera
as 14-41416
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE MICHEL SALAS-OLVERA
Michel v. Craiglind Group, Inc. et al
as 0:2011cv62385
Plaintiff:
Jose Michel
Defendant:
Craiglind Group, Inc., Linda A. Frohring and Craig A. Frohring
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
