Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Rojas-Meliton v. Lumpkin
as 23-20575
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jose Rojas-Meliton
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Rojas-Meliton v. Lumpkin
as 23-20308
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jose Rojas-Meliton
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Rojas-Meliton v. Lumpkin
as 23-20153
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jose Rojas-Meliton
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Angers et al v. Chavez et al
as 1:2023cv02242
Plaintiff:
Megan Angers, Jamey Arnold, Adriana Antunez and others
Defendant:
#14182 Jesse Chavez, #5442 Mark Styczynski, #3809 Kyle Gleeson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Civil Rights
Ahmed v. Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, LP et al
as 1:2023cv01301
Plaintiff:
Awais Ahmed
Defendant:
Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, LP and Jose Rojas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Rojas-Meliton v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv00537
Petitioner:
Jose Rojas-Meliton
Respondent:
Senior Warden Juan Garcia, Garth Parker and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Jose Rojas-Guzman
as 21-10348
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE ROJAS-GUZMAN, AKA Angel, AKA Jose Guadalupe Rojas-Guzman
USA v. Guadalupe Rojas-Guzman
as 21-10347
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GUADALUPE ROJAS-GUZMAN, AKA Angel, AKA Jose Rojas-Guzman
Martin v. US
as 21-2255
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DONALD MARTIN, JR., PATRICIA A. MANBECK, JEFF ROBERTS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Jose Rojas-Torres v. Merrick Garland
as 21-70969
Petitioner:
JOSE ROJAS-TORRES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
