Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Kramer v. Broomfield et al
as 4:2024cv02417
Plaintiff:
Daniel A. Kramer
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield, Ralph Diaz, J. Clark Kelso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poye-Perez v. Diaz et al
as 3:2023cv04933
Plaintiff:
Serguey Poye-Perez
Defendant:
R Diaz, K Allison, R Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Eckstrom v. Bick et al
as 2:2023cv01488
Plaintiff:
Carl Eckstrom
Defendant:
Joseph Bick, Uzma Chaudhry and Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Brown v. Broomfield et al
as 5:2023cv00783
Plaintiff:
Roy L. Brown
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield, Ralph Diaz, Ron Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hartley v. Bright et al
as 5:2023cv00767
Plaintiff:
Roger Andrew Hartley
Defendant:
D.O. D. Bright, M.D. Joseph Bick, K. Kumar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Allison
as 4:2022cv07442
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lee Walker
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Ralph Diaz, Ronald Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Neal v. Allison et al
as 3:2022cv07367
Plaintiff:
Michael Sr. O'Neal
Defendant:
Secretary Kathleen Allison, Ralph Diaz, Ron Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shabazz v. Broomfield et al
as 5:2022cv05569
Plaintiff:
Amir Shabazz
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield, Ralph Diaz, Ronald Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coles v. Allison et al
as 3:2022cv05349
Plaintiff:
George E. Coles
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Ralph Diaz, Ronald Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
