Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Bland v. New Image Towing & Recovery et al
as 1:2021cv00609
Defendant:
Kevin Roberts, Clayton County Police Dept. and New Image Towing & Recovery
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bland v. New Image Towing & Recovery et al
as 2:2020cv02724
Defendant:
Clayton County Police Dept., New Image Towing & Recovery and Kevin Roberts
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Bland v. USA
as 17-5514
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH BLAND
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Joseph Bland v. Daniel French, et al
as 15-5418
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH BLAND
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL T. FRENCH, Assistant United States Attorney, LOREN J. SMITH, United States Probation Officer, CLIFF L. CAVER, a Sex Offender Specialist at the United States Probation Office and others
Joseph Bland v. Daniel French, et al
as 15-5214
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH BLAND
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL T. FRENCH, Assistant United States Attorney, LOREN J. SMITH, United States Probation Officer, CLIFF L. CAVER, a Sex Offender Specialist at the United States Probation Office and others
Bland v. French et al
as 2:2014cv02184
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bland
Defendant:
Daniel T. French, Loren J. Smith, Cliff L. Caver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bland v. United States of America
as 2:2014cv02086
Petitioner:
Joseph Bland
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Bland v. Warden, USP Atlanta
as 1:2012cv02972
Petitioner:
Joseph Bland
Respondent:
Warden, USP Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Joseph Bland v. Warden, USP Atlanta
as 12-5382
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH BLAND
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, USP ATLANTA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
