Cases
William Joseph Britton et al v. Santa Barbara DAs Office et al
as 2:2020cv07085
Defendant: Santa Barbara Public Defenders Office, Santa Barbara Sheriffs Department and County Jail, Santa Barbara DAs Office and others
Plaintiff: William Joseph Britton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Joseph Britton et al v. San Luis Obispo DAs Office et al
as 2:2020cv07108
Defendant: San Luis Obispo DAs Office, San Luis Obispo County Jail, Grover Beach Police Department and others
Plaintiff: Austin Hanysz, William Joseph Britton, Shauna Ault Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv00238
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stanley v. Schmidt et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv01782
Plaintiff: Andrew D. Stanley
Defendant: Paul Schmidt, Joseph Britton, George McKnight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Idaho Republican Party, et al v. John Haight, et al
as 11-35251
Plaintiff - Appellee: THE IDAHO REPUBLICAN PARTY, Its Executive Committee and Its State Central Committee and NORMAN SEMANKO, Chairman and Executive Director (Formally Sidney S. Smith)
Defendant: BEN YSURSA, In his official capacity as Secretary of the State of Idaho
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant: JOHN HAIGHT, MITCH R. CAMPBELL, LAUNA NOBLE and others
Robinson, et al v. Eastman Kodak
as 6:2002cv06204
Plaintiff: Lawrence T Heinsler, Stephen M. Ellis, Thomas L. Braden and others
Special Master: Esq. Steven V Modica
Defendant: Eastman Kodak Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?