Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Samuel v. McDonald et al
as 1:2022cv10571
Plaintiff:
Stephon Samuel
Defendant:
Joseph D. McDonald, Jr., Superintendent Antone Moniz, Ralph Mattarello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. McDonald et al
as 1:2022cv10369
Plaintiff:
Duane Curtis Gomez
Respondent:
Sheriff Joseph D. McDonald, Jr. and Antone Moniz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thompson v. McDonald et al
as 1:2021cv11259
Petitioner:
Anthony Mondrez Thompson
Respondent:
Joseph D. McDonald, Jr., Gerald Pudolsky, Antone Moniz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Davis v. McDonald et al
as 1:2021cv10571
Defendant:
Joseph D. McDonald, Amy Stock, Captain Nye and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goretskiy v. Moniz
as 1:2020cv12265
Respondent:
Joseph D. McDonald and Antone Moniz
Petitioner:
Igor Y. Goretskiy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pena Rodriguez v. Moniz
as 1:2020cv11786
Petitioner:
Reimon Pena Rodriguez
Not Classified By Court:
Sheriff Joseph D. McDonald, Jr.
Respondent:
Antone Moniz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Baez et al v. McDonald et al
as 1:2020cv10753
Petitioner:
Jonathan Bermudez, Jermaine Gonsalves, Anthony Baez and others
Respondent:
Antone Moniz, Joseph D. McDonald, Jr. and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Baptista v. Lyons et al
as 1:2019cv11467
Respondent:
Mr. Todd Lyons, Superintendent Antone Moniz and Joseph D. McDonald, Jr.
Petitioner:
Alirio Teixeira Baptista
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Khaled v. McDonald
as 1:2019cv10993
Petitioner:
Omar Khaled
Respondent:
Joseph D. McDonald, Jr., Todd Lyons, Matheus Witiaker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gottesfield v. Gibbons
as 1:2018cv10376
Respondent:
Joseph D. McDonald, Jr.
Petitioner:
Martin Stephen Gottesfeld
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
