Cases 1 - 10 of 43
US v. Dylan Mescall
as 24-4042
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DYLAN JOSEPH EDWARD MESCALL
BlueLinx Corporation v. Edwards et al
as 3:2023cv02503
Plaintiff:
BlueLinx Corporation
Defendant:
Joseph Edwards, Trent Tucker and 3Wood Wholesale LLC
In re: Joseph Shaw
as 22-13134
Petitioner:
In re: JOSEPH EDWARD SHAW
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
McClain v. Flaig
as 22-50033
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph E. McClain, III, Under Secretary of Labor and Joseph Edward McClain, III, Under Secretary of Labor
Defendant / Appellee:
Robert Flaig, USWD-SATX, U.S. Courts, Lyle Cayce, Clerk 5th Circuit, C.O.A., Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General and others
Lunz v. Trump
as 21-1738
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Edward Francis Lunz
Defendant / Appellee:
Donald John Trump, Former President of the United States of America
Abrams v. City of Niagara Falls
as 21-248
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Latisha D. Hamilton, Ernestine Gayle, as Parent and Natural Guardian of A.G., Kevaris Gregory and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Conestoga-Rovers & Associates, City of Niagara Falls, Glenn Springs Holdings, Inc. and others
Joseph Duncan, III v. USA
as 20-35022
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH EDWARD DUNCAN III
Joseph McClain, III v. Ken Paxton, et al
as 19-50524
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH EDWARD MCCLAIN, III
Defendant / Appellee:
DEMETRIS ANASTASIADIS, Assistant Attorney General, DEBORAH WOLTERSDORF, Assistant, Office of the Attorney General, KEN PAXTON, Texas Attorney General and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
