Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Robert Bailey v. Felica Ingram
as 09-7988
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
FELICA INGRAM, NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES, JOSEPH I. GARDNER and others
Bailey v. Ingram et al
as 5:2009cv00370
Plaintiff:
Robert Gene Bailey
Defendant:
Felica Ingram, North Carolina Division of Motor Vehicles, Joseph I. Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert Bailey v. Steven Butler, Sr.
as 09-7150
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN BUTLER, SR., KIMBERLA BUTLER, NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES and others
Robert Bailey v. Clarence Gaddy
as 09-7029
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY, The Source
Defendant - Appellee:
CLARENCE GADDY, NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES, JOSEPH I. GARDNER and others
Bailey v. Lowery et al
as 5:2009cv00194
Plaintiff:
Robert Gene Bailey
Defendant:
Jill Lowery, Ronald Lowery, North Carolina Division of Motor Vehicles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bailey v. Blue et al
as 5:2009cv00195
Plaintiff:
Robert Gene Bailey
Defendant:
William Blue, North Carolina Division of Motor Vehicles, Joseph I. Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bailey v. Marsh et al
as 5:2009cv00180
Plaintiff:
Robert Gene Bailey
Defendant:
Lo'Teria Shavone Marsh, North Carolina Division ofMotor Vehicles, Joseph I. Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bailey v. Butler et al
as 5:2009cv00153
Plaintiff:
Robert Gene Bailey
Defendant:
Steven Butler, SR., Kimberla Butler, North Carolina Division ofMotor Vehicles and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bailey v. Gaddy et al
as 5:2009cv00060
Plaintiff:
Robert Gene Bailey
Defendant:
Clarence Gaddy, North Carolina Division of Motor Vehicles, Joseph I. Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
