Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Terrance Brown v. Robert Wier, et al
as 24-5386
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE BROWN
Defendant:
JUDGE ROBERT E. WIER, CHIEF JUDGE DANNY C. REEVES and SENIOR JUDGE JOSEPH M. HOOD
Michael Smith v. Frances Cadle, et al
as 21-5370
Defendant / Appellee:
KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, CHAD HARLAN, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL D. SMITH
Smith v. Cadle et al
as 3:2021cv00008
Defendant:
Carmen Bishop, Joseph M. Hood, Kyle Trimble and others
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Smith
Petitioner:
Patrick Nash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easterling v. Trump et al
as 3:2019cv00112
Defendant:
Michael J. Newman, Timothy S Black, Thomas M Rose and others
Plaintiff:
Warren Easterling, r
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Tony Manns v. Joseph Hood
as 10-6435
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY MANNS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH M. HOOD, United States Federal Judge
Manns v. Hood
as 7:2010cv00130
Plaintiff:
Tony Manns
Defendant:
Joseph M. Hood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331
Calvin Goddard v. Jason Terris, et al
as 10-5340
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALVIN LEE GODDARD
Defendant:
JASON TERRIS, DEBORAH A. HICKEY, Warden, LUIS A. MORALES, M.D. Individually and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL GROWSE, Individually, JOSEPH M. HOOD, Judge, Individually and in his Official Capacity, JASPER WHITE, Individually and in his Official Capacity and others
Goddard v. Terris et al
as 5:2010cv00034
Plaintiff:
Calvin Lee Goddard
Defendant:
Jason Terris, Deborah A. Hickey, Luis A. Morales, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Leon Combs v. Joseph Hood, et al
as 08-6351
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEON COMBS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH M. HOOD, District Court Judge and ROGER A. WEST, Assisstant United States Attorney
Combs v. Hood et al
as 6:2008cv00199
Plaintiff:
Leon Combs
Defendant:
Joseph M. Hood and Roger A West
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
