Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Burt et al v. Kankakee City Police Department et al
as 2:2021cv02243
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Burt and Lucille Burt
Defendant:
Kankakee City Police Department and Joseph Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sharpe v. City of Southfield et al
as 5:2020cv13172
Defendant:
Steven Hendricks, Christopher Don, Joseph Martinez and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sharpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv09010
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rustgi v. Reams et al
as 1:2020cv00945
Defendant:
Tyler Piscoya, Steve Reams, Kyle Penny and others
Plaintiff:
Tage Rustgi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rustgi v. Reams et al
as 1:2020cv00943
Defendant:
Tyler Piscoya, Steve Reams, Kyle Penny and others
Plaintiff:
Tage Rustgi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fonder v. Martinez et al
as 2:2018cv02281
Plaintiff:
Darnell Fonder
Defendant:
Officer Michael Shreffler, Officer Joseph Martinez, Michael Shreffler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. FAYETTE COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2017cv01061
Plaintiff:
CHERYL ADAMS
Defendant:
FAYETTE COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY, MARYANN SPOHN, ELONA COLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Joshua Oquendo, et al v. City of Boise, et al
as 17-35259
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOSHUA OQUENDO and AMBER N. OQUENDO, FKA Amber Hall
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF BOISE, JOSEPH MARTINEZ, individually and in his capacity as a police officer for Boise Police Department, JOSIAH RANSOM, individually and in his capacity as a police officer for Boise Police Department and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
