Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Mathis v. Imperial Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
as 3:2023cv01153
Plaintiff:
Joseph Mathis
Defendant:
Imperial Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Mathis v. Dart et al
as 1:2020cv04253
Defendant:
Thomas Dart and Cook County, Illinois
Plaintiff:
Joseph Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donado v. Randle et al
as 1:2013cv09328
Plaintiff:
Saul Donado
Defendant:
Michael P. Randle, Joseph Mathy, Anna McBee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffrey Mitchell v. Jesse Montgomery, et al
as 13-3592
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY J. MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee:
JESSE MONTGOMERY, Parole Supervisor/Individual and Official Capacity, RANDALL FLEX, Counselor/Individual and Official Capacity and JOSEPH MATHY, Warden, Previous Director/Individual and Official Capacity
William Bouchez v. Roger Walker, Jr., et al
as 12-3429
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM L. BOUCHEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER E. WALKER, JR., EDDIE JONES, Warden, SYLVIA MAHONE and others
Jeffrey J. Mitchell v. Jesse Montgomery, et al
as 12-3302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee:
JESSE MONTGOMERY, RANDALL FLEX and JOSEPH MATHY, Warden
Hedger v. Mathews et al
as 1:2011cv01051
Plaintiff:
Daniel G Hedger
Defendant:
Jose Mathews, Joseph Mathy, Guy Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carini v. IDOC et al
as 1:2010cv01300
Plaintiff:
William Carini
Defendant:
IDOC, Joseph Mathy, M Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Ryles
as 4:2010cv01050
Plaintiff:
Joseph Mathis
Defendant:
Victoria Ryles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cordrey v. Mathy et al
as 1:2009cv01382
Plaintiff:
Johnny R Cordrey
Defendant:
Joseph Mathy, Marcus Hardy, P Hastings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
