Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Kittle v. Biden
as 1:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Dustin J. Kittle
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nathan Jacobs v. Joseph Biden
as 24-1028
Plaintiff:
NATHAN E. JACOBS
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President of the United States
Commonwealth of Kentucky et al v. Federal Highway Administration et al
as 5:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, State of South Dakota, State of Alabama and others
Defendant:
Federal Highway Administration, Shailen Bhatt, U.S. Department of Transportation and others
Interested Party:
The American Road and Transportation Builders Association and The Associated General Contractors of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Rachel Robertson v. Joseph Biden
as 23-3942
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RACHEL ROBERTSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President of the United States
Robertson v. Biden
as 2:2023cv02473
Plaintiff:
Rachel Robertson
Defendant:
Joseph R Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv11523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
B. Velarde v. Joseph Biden
as 23-1502
Plaintiff / Appellant:
B. NICHOLAS VELARDE
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN
B. Velarde v. Joseph Biden
as 23-1465
Plaintiff / Appellant:
B. NICHOLAS VELARDE
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN
Terrell Jordan v. USA, et al
as 23-3436
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PRINCE TERRELL D. JORDAN, aka Tracy D. Halsell
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Leathers et al v. United States et al
as 1:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
Anne M Leathers, Michael Roe, Jr., Lonnie Pittman and others
Defendant:
United States, Joseph R Biden, Department of Health and Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
