Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Blose v. JARINC, Ltd. et al
as 1:2018cv02184
Defendant:
John Doe Corp. 1-10, Joseph Romano, JARINC, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Boles and Nathan Blose
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206
Ettienne-Modeste v. Port Authority Police
as 18-1762
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dexter Ettienne-Modeste, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Port Authority Police Department, Joseph Romano, Shield #2437, Police Officer, Police Officer Drew Preston, Shield #3356 and others
Defendant:
Officer John Dough, Police Officer John Doe #1, Police Officer John Doe #2 and others
Romano v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2018cv00414
Plaintiff:
Joseph Romano
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romano et al v. Schofield et al
as 1:2017cv02844
Plaintiff:
Veronica Susan Romano and Joseph Romano
Defendant:
Megan Christine Schofield and Christine Marie Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Romano v. Bristol Myers Squibb, et al
as 1:2017cv01397
Plaintiff:
Joseph Romano
Defendant:
Bristol Myers Squibb and Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ettienne-Modeste v. Port Authority Police
as 1:2017cv01374
Plaintiff:
Dexter Ettienne-Modeste, Jr.
Defendant:
Port Authority Police, Joseph Romano and John Dough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROMANO v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP., et al
as 1:2016cv07420
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ROMANO
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP , JOHN DOE 1-10 and ABC MAINTENANCE COMPANY 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Romano v. Carnesi et al
as 2:2016cv05801
Defendant:
Charles Carnesi, Jane Does and John Does
Plaintiff:
Joseph Romano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Romano v. USA
as 1:2016cv05689
Petitioner:
Joseph Romano
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Romano v. Bristol Myers Squibb, et al
as 2:2016cv14921
Plaintiff:
Joseph Romano
Defendant:
Bristol Myers Squibb and Pfizer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
