Cases 51 - 60 of 74
Bong v. Chapa et al
as 1:2019cv00448
Defendant:
Heather Rager, Amy Pagel, Paul Chapa and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph James Bong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorn v. Schmidt et al
as 1:2019cv00283
Defendant:
Lyle J Dorn, Sr, Josh Schmidt, Carly Schmidt and others
Plaintiff:
Lyle J Dorn, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett et al v Waupaca Foundry
as 1:2018cv01186
Plaintiff:
Darrell McCarthy, Jason Stallings, Thomas Marshall and others
Defendant:
Waupaca Foundry Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Milton, Tyler et al v. Wyberg, Brian et al
as 3:2018cv00513
Defendant:
Brian Wyberg, Jordan Feidt, MacKenzie Hanson and others
Plaintiff:
Tyler Lee Milton
Undetermined:
WCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamb v. Walker et al
as 2:2017cv00220
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lamb
Defendant:
Gov Walker, Sheriff Clark, Captain Sobek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vetterkind, Kaleena v. School District of Bloomer et al
as 3:2016cv00285
Plaintiff:
Kaleena M. Vetterkind
Defendant:
School District of Bloomer , Mary E. Randall and Josh Hartman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Metcalf, Jondrea v. School District of Bloomer et al
as 3:2016cv00213
Plaintiff:
Jondrea M. Metcalf
Defendant:
School District of Bloomer , Mary E. Randall and Josh Hartman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stites, Chad v. Champion, Josh et al
as 3:2016cv00155
Petitioner:
Chad Andrew Stites
Respondent:
Josh Champion and Sarah Wescott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stites, Chad v. Wescott, Sarah et al
as 3:2015cv00506
Petitioner:
Chad Andrew Stites
Respondent:
Sarah Wescott and Josh Champion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Munoz-Estrada, Pedro v. Wall, Edward et al
as 3:2014cv00791
Plaintiff:
Pedro A. Munoz-Estrada
Defendant:
Edward F. Wall , State of Wisconsin Department of Corrections , Paul Kemper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
