Cases 71 - 80 of 263
LEMUS v. SORBER et al
as 2:2021cv04354
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO JAVIER LEMUS
Respondent:
JAMIE SORBER, ESQ. DEBORAH RYAN, A.G. JOSH SHAPIRO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LOPEZ v. CITY OF LEHIGH COUNTY et al
as 5:2021cv04388
Plaintiff:
GEORGE IVAN LOPEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF LEHIGH COUNTY, JAMES B. MARTIN, JOSH SHAPIRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIETRICH v. HARRY et al
as 5:2021cv04317
Petitioner:
SEAN DIETRICH
Respondent:
LAUREL HARRY and JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Powell v. Black et al
as 4:2021cv01642
Petitioner:
Breon Powell
Respondent:
Duane Black, Josh Shapiro and PA Attorney General
Amicus Curiae:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kokinda v. Foster et al
as 3:2021cv00154
Plaintiff:
Jason Steven Kokinda
Defendant:
Cprl. T.H. Foster, Ptlm. K.A. Shiflett, Cprl. S.P. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELLIOTT v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2021cv00262
Petitioner:
GEORGE G. ELLIOTT
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MELISSA HAINSWORTH, ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH SHAPIRO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SAXON v. NICHOLAS et al
as 2:2021cv04137
Petitioner:
JEAN SAXON
Respondent:
WENDY NICHOLAS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RIVERA v. MASON et al
as 5:2021cv03754
Petitioner:
ROBERT RIVERA, JR.
Respondent:
BERNADETTE MASON, JAMES B. MARTIN, JOSH SHAPIRO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
OKORIE v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv01107
Petitioner:
SAMUEL OKORIE
Respondent:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY STEPHEN ZAPALA and ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
YEAGER v. SUPERINTENDENT OVERMYER et al
as 1:2021cv00227
Petitioner:
SUSAN ELAINE YEAGER
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT OVERMYER, D.A ROSS MCKEIRNAN, BERNARD T. HESSLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
