Cases 21 - 30 of 30
OWLFEATHER-GORBEY v. BIDEN et al
as 4:2021cv00131
Defendant:
Black Lives Matter Organization, Unknown Named Governor Of Pennsylvania, Pa Voters & Election Administration and others
Plaintiff:
Chief Michael S Owlfeather-Gorbey and Michael S Owlfeather-Gorbey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FILBERT v. ZAPPALA et al
as 2:2020cv01858
Defendant:
LINDA COHEN, JOY FLOWERS CONTI, MARGRET PICKENS and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH R. FILBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. SHAPIRO
as 2:2020cv04900
Defendant:
JOSH SHAPIRO
Plaintiff:
HUGUETTE NICOLE YOUNG, PH.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker et al v. Wolf et al
as 1:2020cv01601
Plaintiff:
Mark Redman, Donna Redman, Chad Parker and others
Defendant:
Dr. Rachel Levine, Tom Wolf and Josh Shapiro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Noel v. Wolf et al
as 4:2020cv00430
Defendant:
Josh Shapiro, Robert Marsh and Tom Wolf
Plaintiff:
Harold W. Noel, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Helfrich et al
as 1:2020cv00399
Defendant:
Officer Troy Cromer, York County Police Department, Alisa Litavidis and others
Plaintiff:
Franklin Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Auto Equity Loans of Delaware, LLC v. Shapiro
as 1:2019cv01590
Defendant:
Josh Shapiro
Plaintiff:
Auto Equity Loans of Delaware, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johonoson v. Shapiro et al
as 1:2019cv00475
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Josh Shapiro and Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania Board Of Probation And Parole
Plaintiff:
Franklin Johonoson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ISABELLA v. CHAMPAGNE et al
as 2:2017cv02028
Plaintiff:
TERESA ISABELLA
Defendant:
DAVID CHAMPAGNE, PHILADELPHIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COALITION, CHARLES J. WALSH, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
TRICOME v. BARLIEB et al
as 2:2014cv04461
Plaintiff:
DOMENIC TRICOME
Defendant:
ETHAN BARLIEB, BEAU BIDEN, JOSEPH FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
