Cases 21 - 30 of 191
Keckler v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00764
Plaintiff:
Joshua James Keckler
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lukasik v. Annucci et al
as 1:2023cv00394
Plaintiff:
Joshua James Lukasik
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Mr. Gerard Jones and Letitia James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meono v. United States Army et al
as 4:2023cv00794
Plaintiff:
Sandra Meono
Defendant:
United States Army and Joshua James Grether
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GRAY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04100
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA JAMES GRAY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mann et al v. Ridgeview Psychiatric Hospital and Center, Inc. et al (TV2)
as 3:2022cv00383
Plaintiff:
Joshua James Mann and Terrie Mann
Defendant:
Ridgeview Psychiatric Hospital and Center, Inc. doing business as Ridgeview Behavioral Health Services, City of Oak Ridge, Sallee Yarboro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
USA v. Brown
as 22-40697
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Joshua James Brown, also known as JB
Sterling Bank and Trust, F.S.B. et al v. Scott Seligman et al
as 5:2022cv12398
Plaintiff:
Sterling Bank and Trust, F.S.B. and Sterling Bancorp, Inc.
Defendant:
Scott Seligman, K.I.S.S. Dynasty Trust No. 9, Scott J. Seligman 1993 Long Term Irrevocable Dynasty Trust and others
LOWERY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13978
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA JAMES LOWERY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOUSE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13700
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA JAMES HOUSE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11455
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA JAMES CLARK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
