Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Mulder v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Mary Joy Mulder
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. and Vantage Mobility International LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
White v. Lauristen et al
as 4:2023cv00027
Petitioner:
Lacresia Joy White
Defendant:
Steven Lauristen and Collete Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Denton v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 4:2020cv00111
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Joy Denton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jenkins et al v. Woodbury County, IA et al
as 5:2020cv04013
Defendant:
Shane Frisch, Dawn Boyle, Department of Human Services and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Jo Dawson and Angela Joy Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins et al v. Woodbury County, IA et al
as 4:2020cv00075
Defendant:
Shane Frisch, Dawn Boyle, Department of Human Services and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Jo Dawson and Angela Joy Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Wetsch Abbott Osborn Van Vliet PLC
as 3:2019cv00006
Defendant:
Wetsch Abbott Osborn Van Vliet PLC
Plaintiff:
Joy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Davis v. ZAK, LLC
as 1:2018cv00021
Defendant:
ZAK, LLC
Plaintiff:
Nancy-Joy Elaine Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Van Der Veer et al
as 4:2017cv00206
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Wayne Lee Van Der Veer and Joy Suzanne Van Der Veer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Leonard v. Lenz et al - See Order at #11 regarding service to Plaintiff
as 3:2017cv03037
Plaintiff:
Ozgur Can Leonard
Defendant:
Rachel Joy Lentz and Steven Troy Lentz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burck v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv00476
Petitioner:
Dona Joy Burck
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
