Cases 1 - 10 of 25
BOLIN v. BROWN et al
as 1:2015cv01630
Plaintiff:
PAUL C. BOLIN
Defendant:
EDMUND G. BROWN, A. SCHWARZENEGGER, G. DEUKMEJIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glenn Henderson v. Town of Hope Mill
as 14-2044
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLENN HENDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWN OF HOPE MILLS, OTIS WRIGHT, JAMES ROSEN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Henderson v. Town of Hope Mills, et al
as 5:2013cv00635
Plaintiff:
Glenn Henderson
Defendant:
Town of Hope Mills , Otis Wright , James Rosen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
DeBose v. George et al
as 3:2012cv06169
Plaintiff:
Donald R. DeBose, Jr.
Defendant:
Ronald George, M. Lucas, M. Baxter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Theodore Shove v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 12-17491
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THEODORE C. SHOVE
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGAR, RONALD GEORGE and others
Richard Vieira v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 12-17501
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD J. VIEIRA
Defendant - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Ex Governor, CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, RONALD GEORGE and others
Paul Bolin v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 12-17079
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL C. BOLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Governor, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Ex Governor, RONALD GEORGE, California Supreme Court Justice and others
Gay v. Brown et al
as 5:2012cv04280
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Earl Gay
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, A Schwarzenegger, Ronald George and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carlos Avena v. Edmund Brown, et al
as 12-55986
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLOS J. AVENA
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Governor, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, RONALD GEORGE, California Supreme Court Justice and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
