Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 21-73
Defendant / Appellee:
Christopher Fowler, NYPD Officer (badge #: 3185), sued in individual and official capacities, Keith Dietrich, NYPD Officer (shield #5779), John Doe, NYPD Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Towaki Komatsu
Defendant:
John Doe, 1,
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 20-4103
Defendant / Appellee:
Christopher Fowler, NYPD Officer (badge #: 3185), sued in individual and official capacities, Keith Dietrich, NYPD Officer (shield #5779), John Doe, NYPD Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Towaki Komatsu
Defendant:
John Doe, 1,
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 20-3638
Defendant / Appellee:
Christopher Fowler, NYPD Officer (badge #: 3185), sued in individual and official capacities, Howard Redmond, NYPD Inspector, sued in individual and official capacities, James O'Neill, former NYPD Commissioner, sued in individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Towaki Komatsu
Komatsu v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv07046
Defendant:
John Doe 8-30-17a, The City of New York, James O'Neill and others
Plaintiff:
Towaki Komatsu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bostic et al v. Block et al
as 1:2016cv03684
Defendant:
500 Dekalb Human Resources was Beaten Security Guards Wrongfully Jailed, 79th Precinct, Judge Frederic Block and others
Plaintiff:
Katie Bostic, Regina Bostic, Sharrkia Brent and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HOLMES, et al. v. A.C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv84585
Plaintiff:
WILLIE E. HOLMES, WILLIE E. HOLMES, JUANITA HOLMES and others
Defendant:
ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
