Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Bauer v. Sjue
as 1:2025cv00032
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Bauer
Defendant:
Judge Kirsten M. Sjue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rousseau v. Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe et al
as 1:2024cv00249
Respondent:
Tracy Zephier, Judge Brenda Claymore, Kelsie Haskell and others
Petitioner:
Ronald E. Rousseau
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1303 Tribal Habeas Corpus
Baker v. Stiel et al
as 3:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Kedrick Ramone Baker
Defendant:
Judge Stephannie Stiel, Cass County Jail and Police Officer Anthony Sunner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akouala v. AGU Logistic et al
as 3:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Christian Akouala
Defendant:
AGU Logistic, Court of Works. Comp., Mac Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wilkinson v. Northeast Central District Court Clerk of Administration et al
as 3:2022cv00180
Plaintiff:
Warren James Wilkinson, Sr.
Defendant:
Northeast Central District Court Clerk of Administration, Judge John Thelen, Andrew Eyre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794
Karl v. East Central Judicial District of North Dakota et al
as 3:2014cv00009
Plaintiff:
Peter Alan Karl
Defendant:
East Central Judicial District of North Dakota, Judge Webb and Judge Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Boeng et al
as 3:2012cv00063
Plaintiff:
Robert D Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Mark Boeng , Honorable Judge Webb and Reid Brady
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
