Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Leyva-Reynoso v. USA
as 4:2021cv03144
Petitioner:
Judith Leyva-Reynoso
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rath et al v. General Collection Co.
as 8:2019cv00437
Defendant:
General Collection Co.
Plaintiff:
Lyle Rath and Judith Rath
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv00229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv00565
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Sewell, et al v. Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund, et al
as 8:2016cv00117
Defendant:
Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund, Sheet Metal Workers and Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund
Plaintiff:
Gary W. Sewell and Judith A. Sewell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Wohlers v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 8:2015cv00148
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Judith B. Wohlers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv00292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Blessing v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2014cv03023
Plaintiff:
Judith L. Blessing
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2012cv05004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Ponca Tribe of Nebraska et al v. Erickson et al
as 8:2011cv00234
Defendant:
Michael J. Bittles, Jon Bruning, Vicki Bumgarner and others
Plaintiff:
Rosa M. Huguet and Ponca Tribe of Nebraska
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
