Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Oppenheimer v. Michaud et al
as 1:2023cv00265
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Oppenheimer
Defendant:
Judith Michaud and Meadows Mountain Realty, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00747
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Paldy et al v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01038
Plaintiff:
Lester Paldy and Judith Paldy
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Hammonds et al v. Robeson Health Care Corporation
as 7:2023cv00967
Plaintiff:
Judith Hammonds and Ronnie McGriff
Defendant:
Robeson Health Care Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Bartlett et al v. Travelcamp, LLC
as 5:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Judith Bartlett and Scott Bartlett
Defendant:
Travelcamp, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Bartlett v. Bartlett et al
as 5:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Judith Bartlett
Defendant:
Scott Bartlett and Travelcamp, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ALLEN v. FORTNEY et al
as 1:2022cv00280
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN, SR.
Defendant:
JUDITH A. FORTNEY, CHATHANM COUNTY SHERIFF, GALLOWAY RIDGE AT FEARRINGTON RETIREMENT COMMUNITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALLEN v. FORTNEY
as 1:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN, SR.
Defendant:
JUDITH A. FORTNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PATTERSON et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 1:2021cv00937
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, FLUOR CONSTRUCTORS INTERNATIONAL, ITT, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JUDITH D PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Pichai et al
as 3:2021cv00228
Defendant:
Arthur Cohen, Francesco De Ferrari, Phil Gross and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Antonio Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
