Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Landeros v. Georgeff et al
as 2:2023cv02248
Plaintiff:
Saul Landeros
Defendant:
. Georgeff, . Juergens and . Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lard et al v. Marmon Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04332
Plaintiff:
Jennifer R. Lard, John G. Juergens, Gerald L. Robinson and others
Defendant:
Marmon Holdings, Inc., The Board of Directors of Marmon Holdings, Inc., Marmon Retirement Administrative Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Billups v. Cammack et al
as 1:2022cv03507
Defendant:
H. Cunningham, Cody Cammack, Jeffrey Juergens and others
Plaintiff:
Blake Atlas Billups
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Ware v. Kolitwenzew et al
as 2:2022cv02114
Plaintiff:
Frako Ware
Defendant:
Chad Kolitwenzew, . Juergens, Michael Downey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Downey et al
as 2:2020cv02178
Defendant:
. Coffey, J LeSage, . Norton and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob P Pitts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BACHMANN v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv03184
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
JUERGEN BACHMANN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02802
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BACHMANN v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv00169
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
JUERGEN BACHMANN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Juergens v. Lee et al
as 2:2018cv02236
Defendant:
Myers Transportation Services Inc and James Lee
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Juergens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Medina v. Downy et al
as 2:2016cv02256
Plaintiff:
Charles Medina
Defendant:
Micheal Downy, . Tofari, . Juergens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
