Cases
WEIGANG, OSCAR E. JR. v. UNIVERSITY OF MAINE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00271
Plaintiff: OSCAR E WEIGANG, JR
Defendant: UNIVERSITY OF MAINE, JULIE CURTIS, DAVID DEWITT and others
Not Classified By Court: MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Webster v. Himmelbach et al
as 6:2016cv06581
Plaintiff: James Edward Webster
Defendant: M. Himmelbach, S. Mattingly, Tina Stanford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis et al v. The Rooster & Two Chicks, LLC
as 1:2013cv00966
Plaintiff: Daniel Curtis and Julie Curtis
Defendant: The Rooster & Two Chicks, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Curtis et al v. The Rooster & Two Chicks, LLC
as 1:2013cv00967
Plaintiff: Daniel Curtis and Julie Curtis
Defendant: The Rooster & Two Chicks, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Daniels v. Kloch et al
as 12-3002
Plaintiff - Appellant: John Daniels
Defendant: Richard C. Kloch, Sr., Niagara County Acting Supreme Court Justice, Elizabeth R. Donatello, Niagara County Assistant District Attorney, David J. Farrugia and others
Defendant - Appellee: Ralph, Parole Officer Buffalo Office, Bratek, Parole Officer Buffalo Office, Mark Smith, Parole Officer at the Oneida Correctional Facility and others
Daniels v. Kloch
as 11-2788
Plaintiff - Appellant: John Daniels
Defendant - Appellee: Richard C. Kloch, Sr., Niagara County Acting Supreme Court Justice, Elizabeth R. Donatello, Niagara County Assistant District Attorney, David J. Farrugia and others
Curtis v. Electronic Data Systems Corporation
as 1:2008cv11043
Plaintiff: Julie Curtis
Defendant: Electronic Data Systems Corporation
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Dyke v. Lates et al
as 1:2007cv00460
Plaintiff: William E Dyke
Defendant: Denise Lates, Paul Moritz, Julie Curtis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?