Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Moore v. Rose
as 7:2022cv00109
Petitioner:
Julius T. Moore
Respondent:
Gary Rose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thomas v. USP Big Sandy Penitentiary
as 7:2020cv00085
Plaintiff:
Julius Lee Thomas
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris et al v. USP Big Sandy Warden Joyner et al
as 7:2020cv00063
Plaintiff:
Julius Lee Thomas, Charlie Harris, RonDell Harris and others
Defendant:
Employees/Staff Officers, Etc., USP Big Sandy Food Services Admin, USP Big Sandy Warden Joyner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harris et al v. USP Big Sandy Warden Joyner et al
as 3:2020cv00321
Plaintiff:
Julius Lee Thomas, Charlie Harris, RonDell Harris and others
Defendant:
Employees/Staff Officers, Etc., USP Big Sandy Food Services Admin, USP Big Sandy Warden Joyner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edelen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv00912
Plaintiff:
Julius Edelen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
General Star Indemnity Company v. Louisville Area Governmental Self Insurance Trust et al
as 3:2018cv00012
Plaintiff:
General Star Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Louisville Area Governmental Self Insurance Trust, Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government, City of Louisville and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Knox v. USA
as 2:2016cv00079
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Julius Maurice Knox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. $38,005.00 in United States Currency
as 5:2015cv00027
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$38,005.00 in United States Currency and Julius L Belle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00471
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1367
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
