Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Martin v. NQ Mobile, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv08125
Plaintiff:
James Martin
Defendant:
NQ Mobile, Inc. , Henry Yu Lin, Omar Sharif Khan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Hiller v. NQ Mobile Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv07713
Plaintiff:
Lew Hiller
Defendant:
NQ Mobile Inc., Henry Yu Lin, Omar Sharif Khan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Ghauri v. NQ Mobile, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv07637
Plaintiff:
Tahseen Ghauri
Defendant:
NQ Mobile, Inc. , Henry Yu Lin, Omar Khan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Ho v. NQ Mobile, Inc et al
as 1:2013cv07608
Plaintiff:
Phuong Ho
Defendant:
NQ Mobile, Inc , Yu "Henry" Lin, Omar Khan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00770
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Chen et al v. TYT East Corp. et al
as 1:2010cv05288
Plaintiff:
Hui L. Chen , Guo Z. Wu , Tak S. Cheng and others
Defendant:
TYT East Corp., Jin Hua Restaurant Inc. and Michael Lam
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv00242
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Di v. Prisca Nail Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv02723
Plaintiff:
Xian Hui Di
Defendant:
Qian Lu, Prisca Nail Inc. and Jun Zhang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hubei Jingzhou Yizhuo Industry Co. v. JNJ Restaurant Supplies Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv02642
Plaintiff:
Hubei Jingzhou Yizhuo Industry Co.
Defendant:
JNJ Restaurant Supplies Inc., Jun Zhang, Ning Wang and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Zhang v. New China Express Restuarant, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv03615
Plaintiff:
Xiao Jun Zhang
Defendant:
New China Express Restuarant, Inc. and Hung Chung Ching
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
