Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Fowler v. BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
KELLY FOWLER
Defendant:
June Bray, Sandeep Laumas, Vimal Mehta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Vomvolakis v. Mehta et al
as 3:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Maria Vomvolakis
Defendant:
VIMAL MEHTA, Richard Steinhart, PETER MUELLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Panancherry et al v. Mehta et al
as 3:2023cv01554
Plaintiff:
Pratheesan Panancherry and Jeffrey Bastress
Defendant:
Vimal Mehta, Richard I Steinhart, Peter Mueller and others
Nominal Defendant:
BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Beninson v. Saul
as 3:2021cv00024
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Victoria June Beninson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Ware v. Connecticut
as 3:2020cv00693
Plaintiff:
June Sumner Ware
Defendant:
State of Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ware v. Williams
as 3:2020cv00014
Plaintiff:
June S. Ware
Defendant:
Omar A. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ware v. Williams
as 3:2019cv01245
Plaintiff:
June Sumner Ware
Defendant:
Omar A. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01191
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
JAMES J DOODY III TRUSTEE OF THE MARY Y, DOODY REVOCABLE TRUST DATED JUNE 17, 2002 v. Doody III et al
as 3:2019cv01190
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., James J. Doody III, Seterus, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES J DOODY III TRUSTEE OF THE MARY Y, DOODY REVOCABLE TRUST DATED JUNE 17, 2002
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00089
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
