Cases 1 - 10 of 209
Michael Brown v. Christine Suter
as 24-1610
Petitioner:
MICHAEL K. BROWN
Respondent:
CHRISTINE SUTER
(PC) Brown v. Wright et al
as 2:2023cv02321
Plaintiff:
Steven K. Brown
Defendant:
Wright, Mule Creek State Prison and California Department of Corrections and Rehabiliation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Burla
as 3:2023cv03539
Plaintiff:
Travis K. Brown
Defendant:
E. Burla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown et al v. Annucci et al
as 7:2023cv06056
Plaintiff:
Byron K. Brown, Carlos Arriaga, Terrence Turner and others
Defendant:
Commissioner Anthony Annucci, Sergeant Joseph, John Doe and others
Interested Party:
New York State Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryan Brown v. Ron Neal, et al
as 23-1985
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRYAN K. BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
RON NEAL, Warden and TODD MARSH, Case Manager
(PC) Meneese v. Hill et al
as 2:2023cv00976
Plaintiff:
Jamar Meneese
Defendant:
Rick Hill, Ralph Diaz, K. Michels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryan Brown v. Ron Neal, et al
as 23-1963
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRYAN K. BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
RON NEAL, Warden and TODD MARSH, Case Manager
(PC) Berumen v. Jones et al
as 2:2023cv00898
Plaintiff:
Daniel Berumen
Defendant:
T. Jones, L. Carrasco, M. Mayfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Konz v. Witt
as 0:2023cv00679
Petitioner:
Deanna Sue Konz
Respondent:
Dawanna S. Witt, Michael K. Browne, Andrea Lyn Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
EL et al v. KELSEY et al
as 1:2023cv01458
Plaintiff:
NOBLE CHRISTO EL, TRE N VISCO, LEONARD LUDWIGSEN, JR and others
Defendant:
DAVID KELSEY (in his individual and official capacity) doing business as DAVID KELSEY, WARDEN, K. BROWN, "JOHN" CHARLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
